4.8 Article

Distributed biological computation with multicellular engineered networks

期刊

NATURE
卷 469, 期 7329, 页码 207-211

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09679

关键词

-

资金

  1. FPU (Spanish Government)
  2. James McDonnell Foundation
  3. MICINN [BIO2009-07762, FIS2009-12365]
  4. Consolider Ingenio 2010 programme [CSD2007-0015]
  5. ESF [ERAS-CT-2003-980409]
  6. CELLCOMPUT (FP6) project
  7. FP7 UNICELLSYS [201142]
  8. Santa Fe Institute
  9. Fundacion Marcelino Botin (FMB)
  10. ICREA Academia (Generalitat de Catalunya)
  11. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ongoing efforts within synthetic and systems biology have been directed towards the building of artificial computational devices(1) using engineered biological units as basic building blocks(2,3). Such efforts, inspired in the standard design of electronic circuits(4-7), are limited by the difficulties arising from wiring the basic computational units (logic gates) through the appropriate connections, each one to be implemented by a different molecule. Here, we show that there is a logically different form of implementing complex Boolean logic computations that reduces wiring constraints thanks to a redundant distribution of the desired output among engineered cells. A practical implementation is presented using a library of engineered yeast cells, which can be combined in multiple ways. Each construct defines a logic function and combining cells and their connections allow building more complex synthetic devices. As a proof of principle, we have implemented many logic functions by using just a few engineered cells. Of note, small modifications and combination of those cells allowed for implementing more complex circuits such as a multiplexer or a 1-bit adder with carry, showing the great potential for re-utilization of small parts of the circuit. Our results support the approach of using cellular consortia as an efficient way of engineering complex tasks not easily solvable using single-cell implementations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据