4.8 Article

IκBζ regulates TH17 development by cooperating with ROR nuclear receptors

期刊

NATURE
卷 464, 期 7293, 页码 1381-U13

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature08922

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  3. ERATO
  4. JST
  5. NIEHS [Z01-ES-101586]
  6. Takeda Life Science Foundation
  7. Yokoyama Foundation
  8. Ichiro Kanehara
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21390088] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin (IL)-17-producing helper T (T(H)17) cells are a distinct T-cell subset characterized by its pathological role in autoimmune diseases(1-3). IL-6 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) induce TH17 development, in which the orphan nuclear receptors, ROR gamma t and ROR alpha, have an indispensable role(4-6). However, in the absence of IL-6 and TGF-beta, the ectopic expression of ROR gamma t or ROR alpha leads to only a modest IL-17 production(5,7,8). Here we identify a nuclear I kappa B family member, I kappa B zeta (encoded by the Nfkbiz gene), as a transcription factor required for TH17 development in mice. The ectopic expression of I kappa B zeta in naive CD4(+) T cells together with ROR gamma t or ROR alpha potently induces T(H)17 development, even in the absence of IL-6 and TGF-beta. Notably, Nfkbiz(-/-) mice have a defect in T(H)17 development and a resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). The T-cell-intrinsic function of I kappa B zeta was clearly demonstrated by the resistance to EAE of the Rag2(-/-) mice into which Nfkbiz(-/-) CD4(+) T cells were transferred. In cooperation with ROR gamma t and RORa, I kappa B zeta enhances Il17a expression by binding directly to the regulatory region of the Il17a gene. This study provides evidence for the transcriptional mechanisms underlying T(H)17 development and points to a molecular basis for a novel therapeutic strategy against autoimmune disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据