4.8 Article

Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments

期刊

NATURE
卷 468, 期 7323, 页码 576-U255

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09594

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF IGERT [DGE-0504573]
  2. NIH [T32GM07270, T32HL007312, GM078069, GM064386]
  3. NCI Cancer Center [CA015704]
  4. NIGMS [PM50 GM076547, R01GM79373]
  5. Searle Scholar Award [06-L-111]
  6. Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering [2006-30521]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinetochores are macromolecular machines that couple chromosomes to dynamic microtubule tips during cell division, thereby generating force to segregate the chromosomes(1,2). Accurate segregation depends on selective stabilization of correct 'bi-oriented' kinetochore-microtubule attachments, which come under tension as the result of opposing forces exerted by microtubules(3). Tension is thought to stabilize these bi-oriented attachments indirectly, by suppressing the destabilizing activity of a kinase, Aurora B-4,B-5. However, a complete mechanistic understanding of the role of tension requires reconstitution of kinetochore-microtubule attachments for biochemical and biophysical analyses in vitro. Here we show that native kinetochore particles retaining the majority of kinetochore proteins can be purified from budding yeast and used to reconstitute dynamic microtubule attachments. Individual kinetochore particles maintain load-bearing associations with assembling and disassembling ends of single microtubules for >30 min, providing a close match to the persistent coupling seen in vivo between budding yeast kinetochores and single microtubules(6). Moreover, tension increases the lifetimes of the reconstituted attachments directly, through a catch bond-like mechanism that does not require Aurora B7-10. On the basis of these findings, we propose that tension selectively stabilizes proper kinetochore-microtubule attachments in vivo through a combination of direct mechanical stabilization and tension-dependent phosphoregulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据