4.8 Article

Trans-acting small RNA determines dominance relationships in Brassica self-incompatibility

期刊

NATURE
卷 466, 期 7309, 页码 983-U110

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09308

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20678001, 21112003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A diploid organism has two copies of each gene, one inherited from each parent. The expression of two inherited alleles is sometimes biased by the effects known as dominant/recessive relationships, which determine the final phenotype of the organism. To explore the mechanisms underlying these relationships, we have examined the monoallelic expression of S-locus protein 11 genes (SP11), which encode the male determinants of self-incompatibility in Brassica. We previously reported that SP11 expression was monoallelic in some S heterozygotes, and that the promoter regions of recessive SP11 alleles were specifically methylated in the anther tapetum(1-3). Here we show that this methylation is controlled by trans-acting small non-coding RNA(sRNA). We identified inverted genomic sequences that were similar to the recessive SP11 promoters in the flanking regions of dominant SP11 alleles. These sequences were specifically expressed in the anther tapetum and processed into 24-nucleotide sRNA, named SP11 methylation inducer (Smi). Introduction of the Smi genomic region into the recessive S homozygotes triggered the methylation of the promoter of recessive SP11 alleles and repressed their transcription. This is an example showing sRNA encoded in the flanking region of a dominant allele acts in trans to induce transcriptional silencing of the recessive allele. Our finding may provide new insights into the widespread monoallelic gene expression systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据