4.8 Article

A mildly relativistic radio jet from the otherwise normal type Ic supernova 2007gr

期刊

NATURE
卷 463, 期 7280, 页码 516-518

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature08713

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [K72515]
  2. EC [02662]
  3. national research councils
  4. Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  5. European Community [R113CT 2003 5058187]
  6. Royal Society
  7. NASA
  8. STFC [ST/G002630/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002630/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The class of type Ic supernovae have drawn increasing attention since 1998 owing to their sparse association (only four so far) with long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)(1-4). Although both phenomena originate from the core collapse of a massive star, supernovae emit mostly at optical wavelengths, whereas GRBs emit mostly in soft gamma-rays or hard X-rays. Though the GRB central engine generates ultra-relativistic jets, which beam the early emission into a narrow cone, no relativistic outflows have hitherto been found in type Ib/c supernovae explosions, despite theoretical expectations(5-7) and searches(8). Here we report radio (interferometric) observations that reveal a mildly relativistic expansion in a nearby type Ic supernova, SN 2007gr. Using two observational epochs 60 days apart, we detect expansion of the source and establish a conservative lower limit for the average apparent expansion velocity of 0.6c. Independently, a second mildly relativistic supernova has been reported(9). Contrary to the radio data, optical observations(10-13) of SN 2007gr indicate a typical type Ic supernova with ejecta velocities similar to 6,000 km s(-1), much lower than in GRB-associated supernovae. We conclude that in SN 2007gr a small fraction of the ejecta produced a low-energy mildly relativistic bipolar radio jet, while the bulk of the ejecta were slower and, as shown by optical spectropolarimetry(14), mildly aspherical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据