4.8 Article

The RNA-binding protein KSRP promotes the biogenesis of a subset of microRNAs

期刊

NATURE
卷 459, 期 7249, 页码 1010-U144

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature08025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian ISS [527B/2B/6]
  2. AIRC
  3. CIPE
  4. ISS [526D/39]
  5. EC
  6. NIH [DK018477, DK39949, HL065445]
  7. AICF
  8. Wellcome Trust [WT022088MA]
  9. Novartis Research Foundation
  10. Fondazione Telethon Funding Source: Custom
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_U117574558, MC_U117533887] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. MRC [MC_U117533887, MC_U117574558] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consistent with the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in down-regulating gene expression by reducing the translation and/or stability of target messenger RNAs1, the levels of specific miRNAs are important for correct embryonic development and have been linked to several forms of cancer(2-4). However, the regulatory mechanisms by which primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) are processed first to precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) and then to mature miRNAs by the multiprotein Drosha and Dicer complexes(5-8), respectively, remain largely unknown. The KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP, also known as KHSRP) interacts with single-strand AU-rich-element-containing mRNAs and is a key mediator of mRNA decay(9,10). Here we show in mammalian cells that KSRP also serves as a component of both Drosha and Dicer complexes and regulates the biogenesis of a subset of miRNAs. KSRP binds with high affinity to the terminal loop of the target miRNA precursors and promotes their maturation. This mechanism is required for specific changes in target mRNA expression that affect specific biological programs, including proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation. These findings reveal an unexpected mechanism that links KSRP to the machinery regulating maturation of a cohort of miRNAs that, in addition to its role in promoting mRNA decay, independently serves to integrate specific regulatory programs of protein expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据