4.8 Article

Mutations of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-κB in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

期刊

NATURE
卷 459, 期 7247, 页码 717-U124

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07968

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [P01 CA92625-07]
  2. NIAID [R01AI066116]
  3. National Centers for Biomedical Computing NIH Roadmap [U54CA121852]
  4. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society SCOR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common form of lymphoma in adulthood, comprises multiple biologically and clinically distinct subtypes including germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL1. Gene expression profile studies have shown that its most aggressive subtype, ABC-DLBCL, is associated with constitutive activation of the NF-kappa B transcription complex(2). However, except for a small fraction of cases(3), it remains unclear whether NF-kappa B activation in these tumours represents an intrinsic program of the tumour cell of origin or a pathogenetic event. Here we show that >50% of ABC-DLBCL and a smaller fraction of GCB- DLBCL carry somatic mutations in multiple genes, including negative (TNFAIP3, also called A20) and positive (CARD11, TRAF2, TRAF5, MAP3K7 (TAK1) and TNFRSF11A ( RANK)) regulators of NF-kappa B. Of these, the A20 gene, which encodes a ubiquitin-modifying enzyme involved in termination of NF-kappa B responses, is most commonly affected, with similar to 30% of patients displaying biallelic inactivation by mutations and/or deletions. When reintroduced in cell lines carrying biallelic inactivation of the gene, A20 induced apoptosis and cell growth arrest, indicating a tumour suppressor role. Less frequently, missense mutations of TRAF2 and CARD11 produce molecules with significantly enhanced ability to activate NF-kappa B. Thus, our results demonstrate that NF-kappa B activation in DLBCL is caused by genetic lesions affecting multiple genes, the loss or activation of which may promote lymphomagenesis by leading to abnormally prolonged NF-kappa B responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据