4.8 Article

Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells

期刊

NATURE
卷 461, 期 7268, 页码 1292-1295

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature08534

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. MRC [G0800784] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0800784, G0800784B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pluripotent state, which is first established in the primitive ectoderm cells of blastocysts, is lost progressively and irreversibly during subsequent development(1). For example, development of post-implantation epiblast cells from primitive ectoderm involves significant transcriptional and epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation and X chromosome inactivation(2), which create a robust epigenetic barrier and prevent their reversion to a primitive-ectoderm-like state. Epiblast cells are refractory to leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-STAT3 signalling, but they respond to activin/basic fibroblast growth factor to form self-renewing epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs), which exhibit essential properties of epiblast cells(3,4) and that differ from embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from primitive ectoderm(5). Here we show reprogramming of advanced epiblast cells fromembryonic day 5.5-7.5mouseembryos with uniform expression of N-cadherin and inactive X chromosome to ES-cell-like cells (rESCs) in response to LIF-STAT3 signalling. Cultured epiblast cells overcome the epigenetic barrier progressively as they proceed with the erasure of key properties of epiblast cells, resulting in DNA demethylation, X reactivation and expression of E-cadherin. The accompanying changes in the transcriptome result in a loss of phenotypic and epigenetic memory of epiblast cells. Using this approach, we report reversion of established EpiSCs to rESCs. Moreover, unlike epiblast and EpiSCs, rESCs contribute to somatic tissues and germ cells in chimaeras. Further studies may reveal how signalling-induced epigenetic reprogramming may promote reacquisition of pluripotency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据