4.8 Article

Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells

期刊

NATURE
卷 458, 期 7239, 页码 780-U123

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07733

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Foundation
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Machiah foundation
  5. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
  6. Radiological Society of North America
  7. Leonard B. Holman Research Pathway fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The metabolism of oxygen, although central to life, produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) that have been implicated in processes as diverse as cancer, cardiovascular disease and ageing. It has recently been shown that central nervous system stem cells(1,2) and haematopoietic stem cells and early progenitors(3-6) contain lower levels of ROS than their more mature progeny, and that these differences are critical for maintaining stem cell function. We proposed that epithelial tissue stem cells and their cancer stem cell (CSC) counterparts may also share this property. Here we show that normal mammary epithelial stem cells contain lower concentrations of ROS than their more mature progeny cells. Notably, subsets of CSCs in some human and murine breast tumours contain lower ROS levels than corresponding non-tumorigenic cells (NTCs). Consistent with ROS being critical mediators of ionizing-radiation-induced cell killing(7,8), CSCs in these tumours develop less DNA damage and are preferentially spared after irradiation compared to NTCs. Lower ROS levels in CSCs are associated with increased expression of free radical scavenging systems. Pharmacological depletion of ROS scavengers in CSCs markedly decreases their clonogenicity and results in radiosensitization. These results indicate that, similar to normal tissue stem cells, subsets of CSCs in some tumours contain lower ROS levels and enhanced ROS defences compared to their non-tumorigenic progeny, which may contribute to tumour radioresistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据