4.8 Article

Measurement of the charge and current of magnetic monopoles in spin ice

期刊

NATURE
卷 461, 期 7266, 页码 956-U211

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature08500

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/C534654/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C534654/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transport of electrically charged quasiparticles (based on electrons or ions) plays a pivotal role in modern technology as well as in determining the essential functions of biological organisms. In contrast, the transport of magnetic charges has barely been explored experimentally, mainly because magnetic charges, in contrast to electric ones, are generally considered at best to be convenient macroscopic parameters(1,2), rather than well-defined quasiparticles. However, it was recently proposed that magnetic charges can exist in certain materials in the form of emergent excitations that manifest like point charges, or magnetic monopoles(3). Here we address the question of whether such magnetic charges and their associated currents-'magnetricity'-can be measured directly in experiment, without recourse to any material-specific theory. By mapping the problem onto Onsager's theory of electrolytes(4), we show that this is indeed possible, and devise an appropriate method for the measurement of magnetic charges and their dynamics. Using muon spin rotation as a suitable local probe, we apply the method to a real material, the 'spin ice' Dy(2)Ti(2)O(7) (refs 5-8). Our experimental measurements prove that magnetic charges exist in this material, interact via a Coulomb potential, and have measurable currents. We further characterize deviations from Ohm's law, and determine the elementary unit of magnetic charge to be 5 mu(B) angstrom(-1), which is equal to that recently predicted using the microscopic theory of spin ice(3). Our measurement of magnetic charge and magnetic current establishes an instance of a perfect symmetry between electricity and magnetism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据