4.8 Article

The Kondo effect in ferromagnetic atomic contacts

期刊

NATURE
卷 458, 期 7242, 页码 1150-U85

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07878

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union through MolSpinQIP and Spanish MEC [MAT2007-65487, 31099-E, CSD2007-0010]
  2. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-0528969]
  3. NSF [DMR-0347253]
  4. Lucille Packard Foundation
  5. W. M. Keck Program in Quantum Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron, cobalt and nickel are archetypal ferromagnetic metals. In bulk, electronic conduction in these materials takes place mainly through the s and p electrons, whereas the magnetic moments are mostly in the narrow d-electron bands, where they tend to align. This general picture may change at the nanoscale because electrons at the surfaces of materials experience interactions that differ from those in the bulk. Here we show direct evidence for such changes: electronic transport in atomic-scale contacts of pure ferromagnets ( iron, cobalt and nickel), despite their strong bulk ferromagnetism, unexpectedly reveal Kondo physics, that is, the screening of local magnetic moments by the conduction electrons below a characteristic temperature(1). The Kondo effect creates a sharp resonance at the Fermi energy, affecting the electrical properties of the system; this appears as a Fano-Kondo resonance(2) in the conductance characteristics as observed in other artificial nanostructures(3-11). The study of hundreds of contacts shows material-dependent log-normal distributions of the resonance width that arise naturally from Kondo theory(12). These resonances broaden and disappear with increasing temperature, also as in standard Kondo systems(4-7). Our observations, supported by calculations, imply that coordination changes can significantly modify magnetism at the nanoscale. Therefore, in addition to standard micromagnetic physics, strong electronic correlations along with atomic-scale geometry need to be considered when investigating the magnetic properties of magnetic nanostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据