4.8 Article

The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome

期刊

NATURE
卷 458, 期 7236, 页码 362-U129

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07667

关键词

-

资金

  1. CIHR
  2. NIH
  3. European Research Council (ERC)
  4. NSERC
  5. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
  6. University Cancer Research Funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleosome organization is critical for gene regulation(1). In living cells this organization is determined by multiple factors, including the action of chromatin remodellers(2), competition with site-specific DNA-binding proteins(3), and the DNA sequence preferences of the nucleosomes themselves(4-8). However, it has been difficult to estimate the relative importance of each of these mechanisms in vivo(7,9-11), because in vivo nucleosome maps reflect the combined action of all influencing factors. Here we determine the importance of nucleosome DNA sequence preferences experimentally by measuring the genome-wide occupancy of nucleosomes assembled on purified yeast genomic DNA. The resulting map, in which nucleosome occupancy is governed only by the intrinsic sequence preferences of nucleosomes, is similar to in vivo nucleosome maps generated in three different growth conditions. In vitro, nucleosome depletion is evident at many transcription factor binding sites and around gene start and end sites, indicating that nucleosome depletion at these sites in vivo is partly encoded in the genome. We confirm these results with a micrococcal nuclease-independent experiment that measures the relative affinity of nucleosomes for similar to 40,000 double-stranded 150-base-pair oligonucleotides. Using our in vitro data, we devise a computational model of nucleosome sequence preferences that is significantly correlated with in vivo nucleosome occupancy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Our results indicate that the intrinsic DNA sequence preferences of nucleosomes have a central role in determining the organization of nucleosomes in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据