4.8 Article

ATP drives lamina propria TH17 cell differentiation

期刊

NATURE
卷 455, 期 7214, 页码 808-U10

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07240

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  3. Osaka Foundation for the Promotion of Clinical Immunology
  4. Ichiro Kanehara Foundation
  5. Sumitomo Foundation
  6. Senri Life Science Foundation
  7. Naito Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin ( IL)- 17- producing CD4 1 T lymphocytes ( T(H)17 cells) constitute a subset of T- helper cells involved in host defence and several immune disorders(1,2). An intriguing feature of T(H)17 cells is their selective and constitutive presence in the intestinal lamina propria(3). Here we show that adenosine 5 '- triphosphate ( ATP) that can be derived from commensal bacteria activates a unique subset of lamina propria cells, CD70(high) CD11c(low) cells, leading to the differentiation of T(H)17 cells. Germ- free mice exhibit much lower concentrations of luminal ATP, accompanied by fewer lamina propria T(H)17 cells, compared to specific- pathogen- free mice. Systemic or rectal administration of ATP into these germ- free mice results in a marked increase in the number of lamina propria T(H)17 cells. A CD70(high) CD11c(low) subset of the lamina propria cells expresses T(H)17- prone molecules, such as IL- 6, IL- 23p19 and trans-forming-growth- factor-beta-activating integrin-alpha V and -beta 8, in response to ATP stimulation, and preferentially induces T(H)17 differentiation of co- cultured naive CD4(+) T cells. The critical role of ATP is further underscored by the observation that administration of ATP exacerbates a T- cell- mediated colitis model with enhanced T(H)17 differentiation. These observations highlight the importance of commensal bacteria and ATP for T(H)17 differentiation in health and disease, and offer an explanation of why T(H)17 cells specifically present in the intestinal lamina propria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据