4.8 Article

SCFβ-TRCP controls oncogenic transformation and neural differentiation through REST degradation

期刊

NATURE
卷 452, 期 7185, 页码 370-U11

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature06780

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG011085, R01 AG011085-16] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM054137-13, R01 GM071004, R01 GM054137] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [F31 NS054507, F31 NS054507-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RE1- silencing transcription factor ( REST, also known as NRSF) is a master repressor of neuronal gene expression and neuronal programmes in non- neuronal lineages(1-3). Recently, REST was identified as a human tumour suppressor in epithelial tissues(4), suggesting that its regulation may have important physiological and pathological consequences. However, the pathways controlling REST have yet to be elucidated. Here we show that REST is regulated by ubiquitin- mediated proteolysis, and use an RNA interference ( RNAi) screen to identify a Skp1- Cul1- F- box protein complex containing the F- box protein beta- TRCP ( SCF beta-TRCP) as an E3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for REST degradation. beta- TRCP binds and ubiquitinates REST and controls its stability through a conserved phospho- degron. During neural differentiation, REST is degraded in a beta-TRCP- dependent manner. beta- TRCP is required for proper neural differentiation only in the presence of REST, indicating that beta- TRCP facilitates this process through degradation of REST. Conversely, failure to degrade REST attenuates differentiation. Furthermore, we find that beta-TRCP overexpression, which is common in human epithelial cancers, causes oncogenic transformation of human mammary epithelial cells and that this pathogenic function requires REST degradation. Thus, REST is a key target in beta- TRCP- driven transformation and the beta- TRCP - REST axis is a new regulatory pathway controlling neurogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据