4.8 Article

Heterochromatin links to centromeric protection by recruiting shugoshin

期刊

NATURE
卷 455, 期 7210, 页码 251-U79

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07217

关键词

-

资金

  1. Global COE programme (Integrative life Science Based on the Study of Biosignaling Mechanisms)
  2. MEXT, Japan
  3. Toray Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Research on Advanced Medical Technology
  5. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The centromere of a chromosome is composed mainly of two domains, a kinetochore assembling core centromere and pericentromeric heterochromatin regions(1,2). The crucial role of centromeric heterochromatin is still unknown, because even in simpler unicellular organisms such as the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the heterochromatin protein Swi6 ( HP1 homologue) has several functions at centromeres, including silencing gene expression and recombination, enriching cohesin, promoting kinetochore assembly, and, ultimately, preventing erroneous microtubule attachment to the kinetochores(1,3-6). Here we show that the requirement of heterochromatin for mitotic chromosome segregation is largely replaced by forcibly enriching cohesin at centromeres in fission yeast. However, this enrichment of cohesin is not sufficient to replace the meiotic requirement for heterochromatin. We find that the heterochromatin protein Swi6 associates directly with meiosis- specific shugoshin Sgo1, a protector of cohesin at centromeres. A point mutation of Sgo1 (V242E), which abolishes the interaction with Swi6, impairs the centromeric localization and function of Sgo1. The forced centromeric localization of Sgo1 restores proper meiotic chromosome segregation in swi6 Delta cells. We also show that the direct link between HP1 and shugoshin is conserved in human cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that the recruitment of shugoshin is the important primary role for centromeric heterochromatin in ensuring eukaryotic chromosome segregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据