4.8 Article

Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure

期刊

NATURE
卷 453, 期 7193, 页码 396-U50

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature06882

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL084228, R01 HL050490, R01 HL50490] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolic phenotypes are the products of interactions among a variety of factors-dietary, other lifestyle/environmental, gut microbial and genetic(1-3). We use a large-scale exploratory analytical approach to investigate metabolic phenotype variation across and within four human populations, based on H-1 NMR spectroscopy. Metabolites discriminating across populations are then linked to data for individuals on blood pressure, a major risk factor for coronary heart disease and stroke (leading causes of mortality worldwide(4)). We analyse spectra from two 24-hour urine specimens for each of 4,630 participants from the INTERMAP epidemiological study(5), involving 17 population samples aged 40-59 in China, Japan, UK and USA. We show that urinary metabolite excretion patterns for East Asian and western population samples, with contrasting diets, diet-related major risk factors, and coronary heart disease/stroke rates, are significantly differentiated (P < 10(-16)), as are Chinese/Japanese metabolic phenotypes, and subgroups with differences in dietary vegetable/animal protein and blood pressure(6). Among discriminatory metabolites, we quantify four and show association (P < 0.05 to P < 0.0001) of mean 24-hour urinary formate excretion with blood pressure in multiple regression analyses for individuals. Mean 24-hour urinary excretion of alanine (direct) and hippurate (inverse), reflecting diet and gut microbial activities(2,7), are also associated with blood pressure of individuals. Metabolic phenotyping applied to high-quality epidemiological data offers the potential to develop an area of aetiopathogenetic knowledge involving discovery of novel biomarkers related to cardiovascular disease risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据