4.8 Article

Structural analysis of the essential self-cleaving type III secretion proteins EscU and SpaS

期刊

NATURE
卷 453, 期 7191, 页码 124-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature06832

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U54 AI057141, U19 AI107775, 5R01 AI030479, R01 AI030479] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During infection by Gram- negative pathogenic bacteria, the type III secretion system ( T3SS) is assembled to allow for the direct transmission of bacterial virulence effectors into the host cell(1). The T3SS system is characterized by a series of prominent multicomponent rings in the inner and outer bacterial membranes, as well as a translocation pore in the host cell membrane. These are all connected by a series of polymerized tubes that act as the direct conduit for the T3SS proteins to pass through to the host cell. During assembly of the T3SS, as well as the evolutionarily related flagellar apparatus(2), a post- translational cleavage event within the inner membrane proteins EscU/FlhB is required to promote a secretion- competent state. These proteins have long been proposed to act as a part of a molecular switch, which would regulate the appropriate chronological secretion of the various T3SS apparatus components during assembly and subsequently the transported virulence effectors. Here we show that a surface type II beta- turn in the Escherichia coli protein EscU undergoes auto-cleavage by a mechanism involving cyclization of a strictly conserved asparagine residue(3). Structural and in vivo analysis of point and deletion mutations illustrates the subtle conformational effects of auto- cleavage in modulating the molecular features of a highly conserved surface region of EscU, a potential point of interaction with other T3SS components at the inner membrane. In addition, this work provides new structural insight into the distinct conformational requirements for a large class of self-cleaving reactions involving asparagine cyclization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据