4.6 Article

Formula of incipient velocity for flooded vehicles

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 1-14

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-010-9639-x

关键词

Urban flooding; Flood hazard; Flooded vehicles; Vehicle instability; Incipient velocity; Flume experiments

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S76304]
  2. Halcrow Croup Ltd.
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [NCET-100619]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB714102/6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the climate change caused by global warming, the occurrence probability of urban flooding due to flash floods has increased gradually. Flush floods propagate rapidly, which can lead to significant hazard to human life and property. Flood hazard to vehicles has become more noticeable and frequent in recent years. Therefore, it is important to investigate the behaviour of vehicles on flooded streets or roads. In the current study, a formula has been derived to predict the incipient velocity of flooded vehicles according to the mechanical condition of sliding equilibrium. A series of flume experiments were conducted using three types of scaled die-cast model vehicles, with two scales being tested for each type of vehicle. The experimental data obtained for the small-scale model vehicles were used to determine the two parameters in the derived formula, and the prediction accuracy of this formula was validated using the experimental data obtained for the large-scale model vehicles. Finally, the corresponding incipient velocities under various incoming depths were computed using this formula for these three prototype vehicles. It is found that for a specified vehicle, the value of incipient velocity reaches its minimum as the incoming flow depth approaches the height of the vehicle, and the smaller and lighter vehicle like Mini Cooper is the easiest to start sliding in floodwaters. The results can be used as a preliminary assessment to define the hazard to vehicles parking on flooded streets or roads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据