4.6 Review

Mechanisms of toxic action of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles to selected ecotoxicological test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: A comparative review

期刊

NANOTOXICOLOGY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 57-71

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2013.855831

关键词

Antimicrobials; metal ions; oxidative stress; QNARs; uptake

资金

  1. Estonian target funding project [SF0690063s08, ETF8561, ETF9001, ETF9347]
  2. EU 7th Framework Program [263147, 309314]
  3. EU Regional Development Foundation
  4. Environmental Conservation and Environmental Technology R&D Program project TERIKVANT [3.2.0802.11-0043]
  5. Swiss National Research Program 64 on the Opportunities and Risk of Nanomaterials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly used as biocides. There is however increasing evidence of their threat to non-target organisms. In such a context, the understanding of the toxicity mechanisms is crucial for both the design of more efficient nano-antimicrobials, i.e. for toxic by design and at the same time for the design of nanomaterials that are biologically and/or environmentally benign throughout their life-cycle (safe by design). This review provides a comprehensive and critical literature overview on Ag, ZnO and CuO NPs' toxicity mechanisms on the basis of various environmentally relevant test species and mammalian cells in vitro. In addition, factors modifying the toxic effect of nanoparticles, e. g. impact of the test media, are discussed. Literature analysis revealed three major phenomena driving the toxicity of these nanoparticles: (i) dissolution of nanoparticles, (ii) organism-dependent cellular uptake of NPs and (iii) induction of oxidative stress and consequent cellular damages. The emerging information on quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of nanomaterials' toxic effects and the challenges of extrapolation of laboratory results to the environment are also addressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据