4.6 Article

Coating-dependent induction of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles

期刊

NANOTOXICOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 44-56

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2013.847505

关键词

Coating; cytotoxicity; DNA damage; genotoxicity; human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells; human peripheral lymphocytes; iron oxide; nanoparticles

资金

  1. EC [Health-2007-1.3-4, 201335, INFRA-2010-1.131, 214547-2, NMP.2012.1.3-3, 310584]
  2. ITMS from the European Regional Development Fund [2424012033]
  3. NILU [106179, 106170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface coatings of nanoparticles (NPs) are known to influence advantageous features of NPs as well as potential toxicity. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) NPs are applied for both medical diagnostics and targeted drug delivery. We investigated the potential cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of uncoated iron oxide (U-Fe3O4) NPs in comparison with oleate-coated iron oxide (OC-Fe3O4) NPs. Testing was performed in vitro in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells and in primary human blood cells. For cytotoxicity testing, relative growth activity, trypan blue exclusion, H-3-thymidine incorporation and cytokinesis-block proliferation index were assessed. Genotoxicity was evaluated by the alkaline comet assay for detection of strand breaks and oxidized purines. Particle characterization was performed in the culture medium. Cellular uptake, morphology and pathology were evaluated by electron microscopy. U-Fe3O4 NPs were found not to be cytotoxic (considering interference of NPs with proliferation test) or genotoxic under our experimental conditions. In contrast, OC-Fe3O4 NPs were cytotoxic in a dose-dependent manner, and also induced DNA damage, indicating genotoxic potential. Intrinsic properties of sodium oleate were excluded as a cause of the toxic effect. Electron microscopy data were consistent with the cytotoxicity results. Coating clearly changed the behaviour and cellular uptake of the NPs, inducing pathological morphological changes in the cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据