4.6 Article

Highly sensitive and rapid isolation of fetal nucleated red blood cells with microbead-based selective sedimentation for non-invasive prenatal diagnostics

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aad8c4

关键词

fetal nucleated red blood cells; non-invasive prenatal diagnosis; microbead-based centrifugal separation; cell release

资金

  1. National R&D Program for Major Research Instruments [81527801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272184, 81572860, 61474084]
  3. National Science Fund for Talent Training in Basic Science [J1210061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics (NIPD) has been an emerging field for prenatal diagnosis research. Carrying the whole genome coding of the fetus, fetal nucleated red blood cells (FNRBCs) have been pursued as a surrogate biomarker traveling around in maternal blood. Here, by combining a unique microbead-based centrifugal separation and enzymatic release, we demonstrated a novel method for FNRBC isolation from the blood samples. First, the gelatin-coated silica microbeads were modified with FNRBC-specific antibody (anti-CD147) to capture the target cells in the blood samples. Then, the density difference between microbead-bound FNRBCs and normal blood cells enables the purification of FNRBCs via an improved high-density percoll-based separation. The non-invasive release of FNRBCs can then be achieved by enzymatically degrding the gelatin film on the surface of the microbeads, allowing a gentle release of the captured target cells with as high as 84% efficiency and similar to 80% purity. We further applied it to isolate fetal cells from maternal peripheral blood. The released cells were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction to verify their fetal origin and fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect fetal chromosome disorders. This straightforward and reliable alternative platform for FNRBC detection may have the potential for realizing facile NIPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据