4.6 Article

High-voltage and high-rate symmetric supercapacitor based on MnO2-polypyrrole hybrid nanofilm

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 25, 期 30, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/30/305401

关键词

MnO2-polypyrrole; symmetric supercapacitors; high voltage; high rate; charge storage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51102105, 11104088]
  2. Hubei Province [2013CFA023]
  3. Youth Chenguang Project of Science and Technology of Wuhan City [2014070404010206]
  4. Self-determined Innovation Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2013027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A manganese oxide (MnO2) nanosheet film, hybridized with a conducting polymer polypyrrole (PPy), was prepared through the direct reaction of a carbon cloth with potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and through the subsequent chemical polymerization; this type of prepared nanosheet has been used as an electrode for symmetric supercapacitors. The influence of the reaction time in the KMnO4 solution on the capacitive property of the MnO2 film was systematically investigated. Further experimentation revealed that the PPy with the high electrical conductivity had promoted the charge transfer in the MnO2 nanofilm and had played an important role in enhancing the electrode performance (similar to 45.6 mF cm(-2)). An areal capacitance of 25.9 mF cm(-2) and an excellent rate performance (similar to 50.08% of the initial capacitance when the scan rate increases 100 times from 2.5 to 250 mV s(-1)) can be achieved for an aqueous symmetric supercapacitor that is assembled from the MnO2-PPy nanofilm. In particular, an operating voltage of 1.2 V can be delivered by choosing an appropriate electrolyte; this voltage level is much larger than that of traditional aqueous symmetric supercapacitors (<= 1.0 V) and contributes to a high energy density (similar to 3.5 mu Wh cm(-2)). Under such a high output voltage, the device can still maintain similar to 86.21% of the initial capacitance, even after 2000 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据