4.6 Article

Fabrication and properties of TiO2 nanofilms on different substrates by a novel and universal method of Ti-ion implantation and subsequent annealing

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/25/255603

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB939704]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51171132, 11175133, 11005082, 5120115]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [201000141120042, 31100]
  4. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2012FFA042]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a new, novel and universal method to fabricate high-quality titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanofilms on different substrates by a solid phase growth process of ion implantation and subsequent annealing in oxygen atmosphere. Ti ions were implanted into fused silica, soda lime glass, Z-cut quartz, or (0001) alpha-sapphire by a metal vapor vacuum arc (MEVVA) ion source implanter to fluences of 0.75, 1.5 and 3 x 10(17) ions cm(-2) with a nominal accelerating voltage of 20 kV. To understand the influence of the annealing temperature, time, and substrate on the formation and phase transformation of the TiO2 nanofilms, the Ti-ion-implanted substrates were annealed in oxygen atmosphere from 500 to 1000 degrees C for 1-6 h. The formation of TiO2 nanofilms resulted from the slow out-diffusion of implanted Ti ions from the substrates which were then oxidized at the surfaces. The thickness and phase of the nanofilms can be tailored by controlling the implantation and annealing parameters. Since the TiO2 nanofilms are formed under high temperature and low growth rate, they show good crystallinity and antibacterial properties, with good film adhesion and stability, suggesting that the TiO2 nanofilms formed by this method have great potential in applications such as antibacterial and self-cleaning transparent glass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据