4.6 Article

The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 21, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/14/145607

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-30970829, 30672001]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA03Z316]
  3. Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project
  4. Ministry of Education of China [707021]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment [HIT-2008QN06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel biocompatible nanobubbles were fabricated by ultrasonication of a mixture of Span 60 and polyoxyethylene 40 stearate (PEG40S) followed by differential centrifugation to isolate the relevant subpopulation from the parent suspensions. Particle sizing analysis and optical microscopy inspection indicated that the freshly generated micro/nanobubble suspension was polydisperse and the size distribution was bimodal with large amounts of nanobubbles. To develop a nano-sized contrast agent that is small enough to leak through tumor pores, a fractionation to extract smaller bubbles by variation in the time of centrifugation at 20g (relative centrifuge field, RCF) was suggested. The results showed that the population of nanobubbles with a precisely controlled mean diameter could be sorted from the initial polydisperse suspensions to meet the specified requirements. The isolated bubbles were stable over two weeks under the protection of perfluoropropane gas. The acoustic behavior of the nano-sized contrast agent was evaluated using power Doppler imaging in a normal rabbit model. An excellent power Doppler enhancement was found in vivo renal imaging after intravenous injection of the obtained nanobubbles. Given the broad spectrum of potential clinical applications, the nano-sized contrast agent may provide a versatile adjunct for ultrasonic imaging enhancement and/or treatment of tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据