4.6 Article

Solution-processible fabrication of large-area patterned and unpatterned gold nanostructures

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 42, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/42/425303

关键词

-

资金

  1. High-tech Research and Development Program of China [2007AA03Z306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10774011]
  3. Beijing Educational Commission [KZ200810005004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solution-processible fabrication of large-area plasmonic nanostructures using colloidal gold nanoparticles has proven its advantages not only in its simplicity, low cost, high speed, and high flexibility, but also in the realization of some nanoscale optoelectronic devices that cannot be achieved by conventional methods. We demonstrate in this paper a variety of techniques for fabricating different plasmonic nanostructures using solution-processible gold nanoparticles and differently designed annealing processes. Using interference lithography and low-(< 300 degrees C) or high-temperature (> 350 degrees C) annealing processes, we succeeded in fabricating high-quality one-and two-dimensional metallic photonic crystals which exhibit promising optical responses for the exploration of new optoelectronic devices. Furthermore, using direct high-temperature (> 350 degrees C) annealing of a thin film of colloidal gold nanoparticles, we succeeded in fabricating large-area unpatterned isolated gold nano-island structures with a mean diameter tunable from about 35 to 100 nm and a mean height from 20 to 70 nm by controlling the concentration of the gold nanoparticle colloid, the annealing temperature, and the surface properties of the substrate. The corresponding optical response is thus tunable in the visible spectral range by changing the fabrication parameters. This introduces a new lithography-free technique for the preparation of gold nanostructures. These flexible fabrication techniques constitute a systematic route for the realization of plasmonic nanodevices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据