4.6 Article

Hydrogen storage in engineered carbon nanospaces

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/20/204026

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER46411]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is shown how appropriately engineered nanoporous carbons provide materials for reversible hydrogen storage, based on physisorption, with exceptional storage capacities (similar to 80 g H-2/kg carbon, similar to 50 g H-2/liter carbon, at 50 bar and 77 K). Nanopores generate high storage capacities (a) by having high surface area to volume ratios, and (b) by hosting deep potential wells through overlapping substrate potentials from opposite pore walls, giving rise to a binding energy nearly twice the binding energy in wide pores. Experimental case studies are presented with surface areas as high as 3100 m(2) g(-1), in which 40% of all surface sites reside in pores of width similar to 0.7 nm and binding energy similar to 9 kJ mol(-1), and 60% of sites in pores of width >1.0 nm and binding energy similar to 5 kJ mol(-1). The findings, including the prevalence of just two distinct binding energies, are in excellent agreement with results from molecular dynamics simulations. It is also shown, from statistical mechanical models, that one can experimentally distinguish between the situation in which molecules do (mobile adsorption) and do not (localized adsorption) move parallel to the surface, how such lateral dynamics affects the hydrogen storage capacity, and how the two situations are controlled by the vibrational frequencies of adsorbed hydrogen molecules parallel and perpendicular to the surface: in the samples presented, adsorption is mobile at 293 K, and localized at 77 K. These findings make a strong case for it being possible to significantly increase hydrogen storage capacities in nanoporous carbons by suitable engineering of the nanopore space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据