4.6 Article

Electrochemical immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen based on a lead sulfide nanoparticle label

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/43/435501

关键词

-

资金

  1. North Dakota Experimental Program
  2. North Dakota State University
  3. UTA
  4. NSF
  5. DHS [CBET-0736172]
  6. DOD [HDTRA1-08-P-0034]
  7. DOD Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs [W81XWH-08-1-0450]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20575017]
  9. PNNL LDRD
  10. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a lead sulfide nanoparticle (PbS NP)-based electrochemical immunoassay to detect a tumor biomarker, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Cubic PbS NPs were prepared and functionalized with thioglycolic acid (TGA), which stabilized the formed NPs and offered carboxyl groups to conjugate with CEA antibodies. PbS NP conjugated with monoclonal CEA antibody was used as a label in an immunorecognition event. After a complete sandwich immunoreaction among the primary CEA antibody (immobilized on the carboxyl-modified magnetic beads), CEA and the PbS-labeled secondary antibody (PbS-anti-CEA), PbS labels were captured to the magnetic-bead (MB) surface through the antibody-antigen immunocomplex. Electrochemical stripping analysis of the captured PbS was used to quantify the concentration of CEA after an acid-dissolution step. The MBs and the magnetic separation platform were used to integrate a facile antibody immobilization with immunoreactions and the isolation of immunocomplexes from reaction solutions in the immunoassay. The voltammetric response is highly linear over the range of 1-50 ng ml(-1) CEA, and the limit of detection is estimated to be 0.5 ng ml(-1). The performance of this nanoparticle-based electrochemical immunoassay was successfully evaluated with human serum spiked with CEA, indicating that this convenient and sensitive technique offers great promise for rapid, simple and cost-effective analysis of tumor biomarkers in biological fluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据