4.8 Article

Monodisperse Cu/Cu2O@C core-shell nanocomposite supported on rGO layers as an efficient catalyst derived from a Cu-based MOF/GO structure

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 10, 期 37, 页码 17647-17655

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr04475a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum (Beijing) [2462016YJRC018, 2462016YJRC012]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21501197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel copper/copper(I) oxide@ carbon (Cu/Cu2O@C) core-shell nanocomposite monodispersed on the surface of reduced graphene oxide (defined as Cu/Cu2O@C-rGO) was synthesized using a one-step calcination of Cu-based metal organic frameworks (MOFs)/graphene oxide (GO) composite structure. The size of the resultant Cu/Cu2O@C core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) on the rGO layers were mainly distributed in range of about 90-100 nm with good dispersion, which was characterized using transmission electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms, X-ray photoelectron spectrometry and thermogravimetric analyses were also carried out to characterize the structure and composition of the Cu/Cu2O@C-rGO. The catalytic performance of the Cu/Cu2O@C-rGO composite was evaluated using a reduction reaction from 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol. It was demonstrated that the Cu/Cu2O@C-rGO composite exhibited an excellent catalytic performance, which can reach a nearly 100% conversion rate in 90 s with 0.1 mg of catalyst. This catalyst also showed a good performance for the degradation of other organic dyes such as methylene blue, methyl orange and rhodamine B. Additionally, the core-shell structure exhibited good stability and reusability for the reduction reaction, which was because of its relatively better oxidation resistance than that of the bare Cu NPs. This research provided an efficient and stable non-noble metal-based catalyst derived from the MOF/GO structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据