4.8 Article

Assembly-mediated interplay of dipolar interactions and surface spin disorder in colloidal maghemite nanoclusters

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 3764-3776

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr06103e

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission through the Marie-Curie Transfer of Knowledge program NANOTAIL [MTKD-CT-2006-042459]
  2. Italian FIRB grant [RBAP115AYN]
  3. European Social Fund (EU)
  4. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning in the framework of ARISTEIA I [COMANA/22]
  5. Italian FIRB RINAME
  6. Fondazione Cariplo [2010-0612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlled assembly of single-crystal, colloidal maghemite nanoparticles is facilitated via a high-temperature polyol-based pathway. Structural characterization shows that size-tunable nanoclusters of 50 and 86 nm diameters (D), with high dispersibility in aqueous media, are composed of similar to 13 nm (d) crystallographically oriented nanoparticles. The interaction effects are examined against the increasing volume fraction, phi, of the inorganic magnetic phase that goes from individual colloidal nanoparticles (phi = 0.47) to clusters (phi = 0.72). The frozen-liquid dispersions of the latter exhibit weak ferrimagnetic behaviour at 300 K. Comparative Mossbauer spectroscopic studies imply that intra-cluster interactions come into play. New insight emerges from the clusters' temperature-dependent ac susceptibility that displays two maxima in chi ''(T), with strong frequency dispersion. Scaling-law analysis together with the observed memory effects suggests that a superspin-glass state settles-in at T-B similar to 160-200 K, while at lower-temperatures, surface spin-glass freezing is established at T-f similar to 40-70 K. In such nanoparticle-assembled systems, with increased 4, Monte Carlo simulations corroborate the role of the inter-particle dipolar interactions and that of the constituent nanoparticles' surface spin disorder in the emerging spinglass dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据