4.7 Article

Single-step electrochemical deposition of high performance Au-graphene nanocomposites for nonenzymatic glucose sensing

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 331-339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.094

关键词

Graphene; Au nanoparticles; Electrochemical deposition; Non-enzymatic glucose sensing; Electro-catalytic activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51102085, 61274010]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  3. Plan of Youth Science and technology, Wuhan City [2014072704011250]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, high-quality three-dimensional (3D) nanocomposites (Au nanoparticles anchored on graphene, denoted as Au-gra) were synthesized by a simple electrochemical approach, in which the reduction of Au ions and graphene oxide were achieved with a one-step process. The resulting hybrids were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It is found that Au nanoparticles have been successfully supported on the surface of graphene, and the nanocomposites uniformly modified on the electrode with 3D porous structures. Based on cyclic voltammetry and amperometric results, Au-gra efficiently catalyzed the oxidation of glucose in neutral media (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) and exhibited a rapid response time (about 3 s), a broad linear range (0.1-16 mM), good stability, and sensitivity estimated to be 4.56 mu A cm(-2) mM(-1) (R = 0.992, 285.8 mu A cm(-2) mM(-1) vs. geometric area). The electrochemical experiments were performed at a relatively low detection potential (i.e., 0 V), under which the impact from the oxidation of common interfering species could be effectively limited. These results indicated a great potential of Au-gra in fabricating novel non-enzymatic glucose sensors with high performance. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据