4.8 Article

A mechanistic study into the catalytic effect of Ni(OH)(2) on hematite for photoelectrochemical water oxidation

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 4129-4133

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr00569k

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States NSF [DMR-0847786]
  2. Natural Science Foundations of China [90923008, J1103305]
  3. Natural Science Foundations of Guangdong Province [9251027501000002]
  4. University of California, Santa Cruz
  5. Academic New Artist Ministry of Education Doctoral Post Graduate (China)
  6. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a mechanistic study of the catalytic effect of Ni(OH)(2) on hematite nanowires for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Ni compounds have been shown to be good catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water oxidation. While we also observed improved photocurrents for Ni-catalyst decorated hematite photoanodes, we found that the photocurrents decay rapidly, indicating the photocurrents were not stable. Importantly, we revealed that the enhanced photocurrent was due to water oxidation as well as the photo-induced charging effect. In addition to oxidizing water, the photoexcited holes generated in hematite efficiently oxidize Ni2+ to Ni3+ (0.35 V vs. Ag/AgCl). The instability of photocurrent was due to the depletion of Ni2+. We proposed that the catalytic mechanism of the Ni(II) catalyst for water oxidation is a two-step process that involves the fast initial oxidation of Ni2+ to Ni3+, and followed by the slow oxidation of Ni3+ to Ni4+, which is believed to be the active catalytic species for water oxidation. The catalytic effect of the Ni(II) catalyst was limited by the slow formation of Ni4+. Finally, we elucidated the real catalytic performance of Ni(OH)(2) on hematite for photoelectrochemical water oxidation by suppressing the photoinduced charging effect. This work could provide important insights for future studies on Ni based catalyst modified photoelectrodes for water oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据