4.8 Article

Nanoparticle accumulation and transcytosis in brain endothelial cell layers

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 5, 期 22, 页码 11153-11165

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02905k

关键词

-

资金

  1. INSPIRE (Integrated NanoScience Platform for Ireland) programme
  2. Irish Government's Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, Cycle 4, National Development Plan
  3. EU FP7 Small Collaborative projects NeuroNano [NMP4-SL-2008-214547]
  4. NanoTransKinetics [NMP4-2010-EU-US-266737]
  5. Science Foundation Ireland [09/RFP/MTR2425]
  6. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [09/RFP/MTR2425] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a selective barrier, which controls and limits access to the central nervous system (CNS). The selectivity of the BBB relies on specialized characteristics of the endothelial cells that line the microvasculature, including the expression of intercellular tight junctions, which limit paracellular permeability. Several reports suggest that nanoparticles have a unique capacity to cross the BBB. However, direct evidence of nanoparticle transcytosis is difficult to obtain, and we found that typical transport studies present several limitations when applied to nanoparticles. In order to investigate the capacity of nanoparticles to access and transport across the BBB, several different nanomaterials, including silica, titania and albumin-or transferrin-conjugated gold nanoparticles of different sizes, were exposed to a human in vitro BBB model of endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells. Extensive transmission electron microscopy imaging was applied in order to describe nanoparticle endocytosis and typical intracellular localisation, as well as to look for evidence of eventual transcytosis. Our results show that all of the nanoparticles were internalised, to different extents, by the BBB model and accumulated along the endo-lysosomal pathway. Rare events suggestive of nanoparticle transcytosis were also observed for several of the tested materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据