4.8 Article

Three-dimensional SiO2@Fe3O4 core/shell nanorod array/graphene architecture: synthesis and electromagnetic absorption properties

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 5, 期 24, 页码 12296-12303

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr04058e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072038, 51272050, 21271035, 61205113, 21171045]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NECT-10-0049]
  3. Outstanding Youth Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [JC201008]
  4. 111 project of Ministry Education of China [B13015]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a new strategy, i.e., a seed-assisted method, to fabricate a three-dimensional (3D) SiO2@Fe3O4 core/shell nanorod array/graphene architecture. The fabrication processes involved deposition of beta-FeOOH seeds on the graphene surfaces in the ferric nitrate aqueous solution, subsequent growth of beta-FeOOH nanorod arrays on the graphene surfaces in the ferric chloride aqueous solution under hydrothermal conditions, deposition of SiO2 coating on the surfaces of beta-FeOOH nanorods, and final formation of the 3D architecture by a thermal treatment process. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy measurements showed that the SiO2@Fe3O4 core/shell nanorods with a length and diameter of about 60 and 25 nm, respectively, were almost grown perpendicularly on both side surfaces of graphene sheets. The measured electromagnetic parameters showed that the 3D architecture exhibited excellent electromagnetic wave absorption properties, i.e., more than 99% of electromagnetic wave energy could be attenuated by the 3D architecture with an addition amount of only 20 wt% in the paraffin matrix. In addition, the growth mechanism of the 3D architecture was proposed, and thus, the strategy presented here could be used as a typical method to synthesize other 3D magnetic graphene nanostructures for extending their application areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据