4.8 Article

Surface functional groups of carbon nanotubes to manipulate capacitive behaviors

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 5, 期 24, 页码 12304-12309

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr04858f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20122010100140]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2012R1A1A2044094, 2011-0007677]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The covalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is a basic but important chemistry that can modify their physicochemical properties, resolve their poor dispersion capability, and improve their capacitance to enable their use as high-energy supercapacitors. However, the relationship between functional groups on the CNT surface and their capacitive characteristics has not yet been explored. Here, we demonstrate the influence of carboxylic, sulfonic, and amine groups tethered to CNTs (Cf-CNTs, Sf-CNTs, and Nf-CNTs, respectively) on capacitor performance in an organic electrolyte. The Cf-CNTs show the highest specific capacitance of 129.4 F g(-1), four-fold greater than 31.2 F g(-1) of pristine CNTs, but they reveal the lowest rate capability of 57%. In contrast, the Sf- and Nf-CNTs exhibit specific capacitances of 70.9 F g(-1) and 83.6 F g(-1), two-fold greater than that of pristine CNTs, along with a good rate capability greater than 80%. Despite their pseudocapacitive nature, all functionalized CNTs show a cyclic stability of more than 80% after 500 cycles due to the electrochemical stability of the functional groups. As demonstrated by spectroscopic analysis, the supercapacitive behaviors of the functionalized CNTs originate from specific interactions between functional groups and lithium ions and the alteration of the electronic structure arising from covalent functionalization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据