4.8 Article

Electrodynamic tailoring of self-assembled three-dimensional electrospun constructs

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 5, 期 16, 页码 7528-7536

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr01668d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011, MIT-Pt/BS-CTRM/0051/2008, PTDC/EME-TME/103375/2008]
  2. MIT-Portugal Program (Bioengineering Systems Focus Area) FEDER
  3. FSE
  4. Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian
  5. [SFRH/BD/51188/2010]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/51188/2010, PTDC/EME-TME/103375/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rational design of three-dimensional electrospun constructs (3DECs) can lead to striking topographies and tailored shapes of electrospun materials. This new generation of materials is suppressing some of the current limitations of the usual 2D non-woven electrospun fiber mats, such as small pore sizes or only flat shaped constructs. Herein, we pursued an explanation for the self-assembly of 3DECs based on electrodynamic simulations and experimental validation. We concluded that the self-assembly process is driven by the establishment of attractive electrostatic forces between the positively charged aerial fibers and the already collected ones, which tend to acquire a negatively charged network oriented towards the nozzle. The in situ polarization degree is strengthened by higher amounts of clustered fibers, and therefore the initial high density fibrous regions are the preliminary motifs for the self-assembly mechanism. As such regions increase their in situ polarization electrostatic repulsive forces will appear, favoring a competitive growth of these self-assembled fibrous clusters. Highly polarized regions will evidence higher distances between consecutive micro-assembled fibers (MAFs). Different processing parameters - deposition time, electric field intensity, concentration of polymer solution, environmental temperature and relative humidity - were evaluated in an attempt to control material's design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据