4.8 Article

The effect of nanowire length and diameter on the properties of transparent, conducting nanowire films

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1996-2004

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2nr30126a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Duke University
  2. NSF's Research Triangle MRSEC [DMR-1121107]
  3. Duke Nanoscience Certificate Program
  4. Duke's Undergraduate Research Support Office
  5. National Key Basic Research Special Foundation of China [2011CB922002]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60736041, 10874238]
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1121107] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes how the dimensions of nanowires affect the transmittance and sheet resistance of a random nanowire network. Silver nanowires with independently controlled lengths and diameters were synthesized with a gram-scale polyol synthesis by controlling the reaction temperature and time. Characterization of films composed of nanowires of different lengths but the same diameter enabled the quantification of the effect of length on the conductance and transmittance of silver nanowire films. Finite-difference time-domain calculations were used to determine the effect of nanowire diameter, overlap, and hole size on the transmittance of a nanowire network. For individual nanowires with diameters greater than 50 nm, increasing diameter increases the electrical conductance to optical extinction ratio, but the opposite is true for nanowires with diameters less than this size. Calculations and experimental data show that for a random network of nanowires, decreasing nanowire diameter increases the number density of nanowires at a given transmittance, leading to improved connectivity and conductivity at high transmittance (>90%). This information will facilitate the design of transparent, conducting nanowire films for flexible displays, organic light emitting diodes and thin-film solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据