4.7 Article

The determination of pharmaceuticals in wastewater using a recombinant Arxula adeninivorans whole cell biosensor

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 439-448

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.107

关键词

Arxula adeninivorans; Microbial biosensor; Omeprazole; Lansoprazole; Amperometric measurement

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology
  2. AiF, Arbeitsgemeinschaft industrieller Forschungsvereinigungen, Cologne [KF2131612CS1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An Arxula adeninivorans based microbial biosensor has been developed for the determination of pharmaceuticals and chemicals such as omeprazole, lansoprazole, beta-naphtoflavone and methylcholanthrene within 5 h using biochemical detection and 4 h and 10 min using amperometric detection. The biosensor consists of genetically modified A. adeninivorans G1212/YRC102-hAhR-hARNT-phyK (hAhR - human arylhydrocarbon receptor; hARNT - human arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator; inducible phyK - derived from Klebsiella sp. ASR1) as the biological component and coupled with either a biochemical or an amperometric detection method. The combination between hAh receptor gene, hARNT and the A. adeninivorans-derived glucoseamylase promoter of the reporter gene (GAA) containing specific cyp1A1-derived core sequence created a construct which enabled specific induction by pharmaceuticals. This offers a new cell-based biosensor for the pharmaceutical determination. The half maximum effective concentration (EC50) and the limit of detection (LoD) were found to be 236.13, 95.01 and 174.72,83.65 mu g/l for omeprazole and lansoprazole, respectively. These two pharmaceuticals are among the most widely used internationally. Additionally A. adeninivorans G1212/YRC102-hAhR-hARNT-phyK cells allow the measurement in raw wastewater, i.e. not concentrated, unpurified and untreated which will allow on-site operation in sewage treatment plants. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据