4.8 Article

Preparation of TiO2 nanowires/nanotubes using polycarbonate membranes and their uses in dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 4162-4169

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1nr10525f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Korean government (MEST) through the Pioneer Research Center [2008-05103]
  3. Korea Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (KCAP) at Sogang University [NRF-2009-C1AAA001-2009-0093879]
  4. Ministry of Knowledge Economy through the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20104010100500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Track-etched polycarbonate (PC) membranes were used as a soft template to synthesize mesoporous TiO2 for use in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The Ti precursor infiltrated into the cylindrical confined spaces of PC membranes. Upon calcination at 500 degrees C, TiO2 nanowires (15TNW) were obtained from PC with a 15 nm pore diameter, whereas TiO2 nanotubes (50TNT and 100TNT) were generated from PC with 50 and 100 nm diameter pores, respectively. TNW and TNT were used as photoelectrodes in DSSCs employing a polymer electrolyte. The ranking of the cell efficiencies of the 200 nm thick TiO2 films was 50TNT (1.1%) > 15TNW (0.8%) congruent to 100TNT (0.7%), which was mostly attributed to different amounts of dye adsorption due to different surface areas. These TNW and TNT films were further coated with the graft copolymer-directed mesoporous TiO2 and were used as interfacial layers between the FTO glass and the 4 mm thick nanocrystalline TiO2 film. As a result, the order of energy conversion efficiency was 15TNW (5.0%) congruent to 50TNT (4.8%) > 100TNT (4.1%). The improved performance of 15TNW was due to a higher transmittance through the electrode and a longer electron lifetime for recombination. The DSSC performance was systematically investigated in terms of interfacial resistance and charge recombination using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据