4.7 Article

Mixed potential type acetone sensor using stabilized zirconia and M3V2O8 (M: Zn, Co and Ni) sensing electrode

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 673-680

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.07.023

关键词

Acetone sensor; YSZ; Mixed potential; Zn3V2O8

资金

  1. Application and Basic Research of Jilin Province [20130102010JC]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61134010, 61327804, 61374218, 61377058, 61473132]
  3. Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13018]
  4. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA030902, 2014AA06A505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of mixed potential type gas sensors using stabilized zirconia and M3V2O8 (M: Zn, Co and Ni) sensing electrode were fabricated and applied for detecting acetone at 600 degrees C. Among the sensors utilizing these composite oxides (Zn3V2O8, Co3V2O8 and Ni3V2O8)-SEs prepared via a facile sol-gel method, the sensor attached with Zn3V2O8-SE exhibited the highest response to acetone at 600 degrees C. Therefore, the present study mainly focused on acetone sensing performance for YSZ-based sensor using Zn3V2O8-SE at 600 degrees C. Results showed that the sensor attached with Zn3V2O8-SE could detect even 1 ppm acetone with an acceptable response. Moreover, AV of the sensor attached with Zn3V2O8-SE exhibited segmentally linear relationship to the logarithm of acetone concentration in the ranges of 1-10 ppm and 10-400 ppm, which the sensitivities were -16 and -56 mV/decade, respectively. The present device also displayed good repeatability, small drifts in 30 days measured period, and the excellent sensitivity and relatively good selectivity in the presence of various interfering gases before and after 30 days high-temperature-aging of 600 degrees C. Additionally, polarization curve was measured to further demonstrate the mixed potential mechanism. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据