4.8 Article

Large payloads of gold nanoparticles into the polyamine network core of stimuli-responsive PEGylated nanogels for selective and noninvasive cancer photothermal therapy

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 739-746

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b9nr00329k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  2. [1800033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A biocompatible photothermal nanomedicine based on a PEGylated nanogel containing gold nanoparticles (GNPs) in a cross-linked network core of stimuli-responsive poly[ 2-(N,N-diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] (PEAMA) gel for cancer photothermal therapy (PTT) was prepared through the reduction of Au(III) ions without any reducing agents. The influence of the reduction conditions, such as pH, temperature, and N/Au ratio (molar ratio of the amino groups in the PEGylated nanogel to the Au(III) ions), on the formation of the GNPs in the stimuli-responsive PEAMA gel core (reducing environment) was also studied. Note that the PEGylated nanogel containing GNPs prepared at pH 6, 60 degrees C and N/Au 1 (PEGylated GNG (1)) was found to have the highest GNP-loading capacity with a diameter of about 8 nm, as observed by TEM; viz., about 27 GNPs formed in a single PEAMA gel core. PEGylated GNG (1) showed a remarkable photothermal efficacy (Delta T = 7.7 degrees C) under irradiation with Ar ion (Ar(+)) laser (514.5 nm) at a fluence of 39 W cm(-2) for 6 min (14 kJ cm(-2)). Note that PEGylated GNG (1) showed non-cytotoxicity in the absence of irradiation with Ar(+) laser (480 mu g mL(-1): > 90% cell viability), whereas pronounced cytotoxicity (IC(50) = 110 mu g mL(-1)) was observed for PEGylated GNG (1) under irradiation with Ar(+) laser at a fluence of 26 W cm(-2) for 5 min (7.8 kJ cm(-2)), because of the heat-generation from the GNPs in the cells, which resulted in selective and noninvasive cancer PTT. Thus, PEGylated GNG (1), which has a high GNP-loading capacity, would be a promising nanomedicine for cancer PTT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据