4.6 Article

The biomolecular corona is retained during nanoparticle uptake and protects the cells from the damage induced by cationic nanoparticles until degraded in the lysosomes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2013.04.010

关键词

Corona; Lysosomal membrane permeabilization; Amino modified polystyrene

资金

  1. Irish Government's Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, Cycle 4, National Development Plan
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [SFI/SRC/B1155]
  3. Knut & Alice Wallenberg foundation
  4. EU FP7 Small Collaborative Project NeuroNano [NMP4-SL-2008-214547]
  5. EU FP7 NAMDIATREAM project (FP7 LSP) [246479]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticles have unique capacities of interacting with the cellular machinery and entering cells. To be able to exploit this potential, it is essential to understand what controls the interactions at the interface between nanoparticles and cells: it is now established that nanoparticles in biological media are covered by proteins and other biomolecules forming a corona on the nanoparticle surface, which confers a new identity to the nanoparticles. By labelling the proteins of the serum, using positively-charged polystyrene, we now show that this adsorbed layer is strong enough to be retained on the nanoparticles as they enter cells and is trafficked to the lysosomes on the nanoparticles. There, the corona is degraded and this is followed by lysosomal damage, leading to cytosolic release of lysosomal content, and ultimately apoptosis. Thus the corona protects the cells from the damage induced by the bare nanoparticle surface until enzymatically cleared in the lysosomes. From the Clinical Editor: This study investigates the effects of protein corona that normally forms on the surface of nanoparticles during in vivo use, describing the steps of intracellular processing of such particles, to enhance our understanding of how these particles interact with the cellular machinery. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据