4.6 Review

Nanoparticles in the treatment and diagnosis of neurological disorders: untamed dragon with fire power to heal

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.08.006

关键词

Nanoparticles; Blood-brain barrier; Neurological diseases

资金

  1. Centre for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Sciences (BioDeakin), Institute for Technology Research and Innovation (ITRI), Deakin University
  2. Department of Innovation, Industry Science, Research, and Commonwealth of Australia [BF030016]
  3. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [30872987]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of neurological diseases of unknown etiology is increasing, including well-studied diseases such as Alzhiemer's, Parkinson's, and multiple sclerosis. The blood-brain barrier provides protection for the brain but also hinders the treatment and diagnosis of these neurological diseases, because the drugs must cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the lesions. Thus, attention has turned to developing novel and effective delivery systems that are capable of carrying drug and that provide good bioavailability in the brain. Nanoneurotechnology, particularly application of nanoparticles in drug delivery, has provided promising answers to some of these issues in recent years. Here we review the recent advances in the understanding of several common forms of neurological diseases and particularly the applications of nanoparticles to treat and diagnose them. In addition, we discuss the integration of bioinformatics and modern genomic approaches in the development of nanoparticles. From the Clinical Editor: In this review paper, applications of nanotechnology-based diagnostic methods and therapeutic modalities are discussed addressing a variety of neurological disorders, with special attention to blood-brain barrier delivery methods. These novel nanomedicine approaches are expected to revolutionize several aspects of clinical neurology. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据