4.6 Article

Experimental and theoretical comparison of intracellular import of polymeric nanoparticles and small molecules: toward models of uptake kinetics

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.03.005

关键词

Nanoparticle uptake; Kinetics; Flow cytometry; Flux-based phenomenological model

资金

  1. EU [NMP4-CT-2006-033231, IST-2005-033700]
  2. SFI RFP [06/RFP/CHP031, 09/RFP/MTR2425]
  3. EU MC RTN Arrested Matter [MRTN-CT-2003-504712]
  4. Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology
  5. Science Foundation Ireland [SFI/SRC/B1155]
  6. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/RFP/CHP031] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Central to understanding how nanoscale objects interact with living matter is the need for reproducible and verifiable data that can be interpreted with confidence. Likely this will be the basis of durable advances in nanomedicine and nanomedical safety. To develop these fields, there is also considerable interest in advancing the first generation of theoretical models of nanoparticle (NP) uptake into cells, and NP biodistribution in general. Here we present an uptake study comparing the outcomes for free molecular dye and NPs labeled with the same dye. A simple flux-based approach is presented to model NP uptake. We find that the intracellular NP concentration grows linearly in time, and that the uptake is essentially irreversible, with the particles accumulating in lysosomes. A wide range of practical challenges, from labile dye release to NP aggregation and the need to account for cell division, are addressed to ensure that these studies yield meaningful kinetic information. From the Clinical Editor: The authors present an uptake study comparing the outcomes for free molecular dye and NPs labeled with the same dye. A wide range of practical challenges are addressed including labile dye release, NP aggregation and the need to account for cell division with the goal that these studies yield meaningful kinetic information. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据