4.6 Article

Interactions of single-wall carbon nanotubes with endothelial cells

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.08.001

关键词

Angiogenesis; Endothelium; Nanoparticles; Nanotubes

资金

  1. Comitato Interministeriale per la Programmazione Economica (CIPE)
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo
  3. AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) could be promising delivery vehicles for cancer therapy. These carriers are generally introduced intravenously, however, little is known of their interactions with endothelial cells, the cells lining vessels and mediating clearance of nanoparticles. Here we show that SWCNTs of 1 to 5 mu m in length, both pristine and functionalized by oxidation, had limited toxicity for endothelial cells in vitro as determined by growth, migration morphogenesis, and survival assays. Endothelial cells transiently took up SWCNTs, and several lines of data indicated that they were associated with an enhanced acidic vesicle compartment within the endothelial cells. Our findings of SWCNT interactions with endothelial cells suggest these may be optimal vehicles for targeting the vasculature and potential carriers of anti-angiogenic drugs. The implications on their biological activity must be taken into account when considering the use of these nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery of drugs. From the Clinical Editor: Interactions of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) with endothelial cells following IV administration remains unclear. Functionalized and naive SWCNTs of 1-5 mm in length had limited toxicity to endothelial cells in vitro. Endothelial cells transiently took up SWCNTs and were associated with an enhanced acidic vesicle compartment within the cells. These findings suggest that SWCNTs may be promising vehicles for targeting the vasculature and potential carriers of anti-angiogenic drugs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据