4.6 Article

PLGA nanoparticle formulations of risperidone: preparation and neuropharmacological evaluation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2008.12.003

关键词

Atomic force microscopy; Psychopharmacology; Photon correlation spectroscopy; Poloxamer 407; Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles; Risperidone

资金

  1. University Grant Commission, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to develop extended-release poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles of risperidone and thermal-responsive in situ gel containing risperidone nanoparticles for parenteral (subcutaneous) delivery and to reduce the dose-dependent extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone. PLGA nanoparticles of risperidone were designed by nanoprecipitation method using polymeric stabilizer (Poloxamer 407). The prepared nanoparticles were characterized for particle size by photon correlation spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. Poloxamer 407-based in situ gel containing PLGA nanoparticles of risperidone was prepared by modified cold method to control the initial rapid release from the nanoparticles. The in vivo efficacy (antipsychotic effect) of prepared formulations (nanoparticles and in situ gel containing nanoparticles) was studied by administering them subcutaneously to mice. Extrapyramidal side effects of the formulations were also studied. The particle size of the prepared nanoparticles ranged between 85 and 219 nm. About 89% to 95% drug encapsulation efficiency was achieved when risperidone was loaded at 1.7% to 8.3% by weight of the polymer. During in vivo studies prepared risperidone formulations showed an antipsychotic effect that was significantly prolonged over that of risperidone solution for up to 72 hours with fewer extrapyramidal side effects. The prolonged effect of risperidone was obtained from the risperidone formulations administered subcutaneously, and this may improve the treatment of psychotic disorders by dose reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据