4.7 Article

Antiarthritic and chondroprotective activity of Lakshadi Guggul in novel alginate-enclosed chitosan calcium phosphate nanocarriers

期刊

NANOMEDICINE
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 819-837

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/NNM.13.219

关键词

alginate; anti-inflammatory; antiarthritic; chitosan; Cissus quadrangularis; collagen-induced arthritis; Lakshadi Guggul; nanocarrier; oral delivery; osteoarthritis

资金

  1. Australia-India Strategic Research Fund (AISRF)
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the antiarthritic and chondroprotective potentials of Lakshadi Guggul (LG) and Cissus quadrangularis encapsulated in novel alginate-enclosed chitosan-calcium phosphate nanocarriers (NCs) both in vitro in primary human chondrocytes and in vivo in mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Materials & methods: Chondrocytes exposed to IL-1 beta and osteoarthritis chondrocytes grown in an ex vivo inflammation-based coculture were incubated with different concentrations of herbals, and cell modulatory activities were determined. For in vivo studies, herbals and their encapsulated nanoformulations were administered orally to DBA/1 mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Results: C. quadrangularis and LG showed enhanced chondroprotective and proliferative activity in IL-1 beta-exposed primary chondrocytes, with LG showing the highest therapeutic potency. LG increased viability, proliferative and mitogenic activity, and inhibited cell apoptosis and mitochondrial depolarization. In vivo studies with LG and alginate-enclosed chitosan-calcium phosphate LG NCs revealed cartilage regenerative activity in those administered with the nanoformulation. The NCs were nontoxic to mice, reduced joint swelling and paw volume, and inhibited gene expression of MMPs and cytokines. Conclusion: The promising results from this study reveal, for the first time, the novel polymeric NC encapsulating LG as a potential therapeutic for rheumatic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据