4.7 Article

Improving the brain delivery of gold nanoparticles by conjugation with an amphipathic peptide

期刊

NANOMEDICINE
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 897-913

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/NNM.10.74

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amphipathic peptide; blood-brain barrier; drug delivery; nanobiomaterials; nanotechnology; neutron activation; photothermal therapy; targeting; theranosis; transcytosis

资金

  1. AECID
  2. AUG-Instituto de Biologia Molecular Aplicada, Argentina
  3. Conicyt via doctoral [AT-24090101]
  4. MECESUP [UCH-0601]
  5. VRID-USACH
  6. [FONDECYT1090143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have promising applications for drug delivery as well as for the diagnosis and treatment of several pathologies, such as those related to the CNS. However, GNPs are retained in a number of organs, such as the liver and spleen. Owing to their negative charge and/or processes of opsonization, GNPs are retained by the reticuloendothelial system, thereby decreasing their delivery to the brain. It is therefore crucial to modify the nanoparticle surface in order to increase its lipophilicity and reduce its negative charge, thus achieving enhanced delivery to the brain. Results: In this article, we have shown that conjugation of 12 nm GNPs with the amphipathic peptide CLPFFD increases the in vivo penetration of these particles to the rat brain. The C(GNP)-LPFFD conjugates showed a smaller negative charge and a greater hydrophobic character than citrate-capped GNPs of the same size. We administered intraperitoneal injections of citrate GNPs and C(GNP)-LPFFD in rats, and determined the gold content in the tissues by neutron activation. Compared with citrate GNPs, the C(GNP)-LPFFD conjugate improved the delivery to the brain, increasing the concentration of gold by fourfold, while simultaneously reducing its retention by the spleen 1 and 2 h after injection. At 24 h, the conjugate was partially cleared from the brain, and mainly accumulated in the liver. The C(GNP)-LPFFD did not alter the integrity of the blood brain barrier, and had no effect on cell viability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据