4.7 Article

DNA damage and p53-mediated growth arrest in human cells treated with platinum nanoparticles

期刊

NANOMEDICINE
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 51-64

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/NNM.09.85

关键词

anticancer; apoptosis; biodistribution; cell cycle; cytotoxicity; DNA damage; genotoxicity; nanomedicine; nanoparticles; platinum

资金

  1. NUSNNI, Office of Life Sciences, Academic Research Fund, Ministry of Education, Singapore [T206B3108, WBS: 185-000-153-112)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Platinum-based therapeutic agents are widely used in medicine. Thus, a thorough understanding of their mechanism of action in cells is warranted. This study investigates the uptake and bioactivity (e.g., cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and protein expression) of platinum nanoparticles (Pt-NPs, similar to 5-8 nm in size) in human cells. Materials & methods: Pt-NPs capped with polyvinyl alcohol were synthesized, characterized and incubated with human cells. Uptake and the biological properties were evaluated through metabolic activity, genome integrity, cell cycle and protein expression. Results: Pt-NPs entered the cells through diffusion, and localized inside the cytoplasm. Exposure to the Pt-NP increased DNA damage, accumulation of cells at the S-phase of the cell cycle and apoptosis. A significant number of cells recovered from the stress and formed colonies. Protein-expression levels uncovered upregulation of p53, phosphorylated p53, p21 and downregulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen following Pt-NP treatment. Pro-caspase 3 and poly-ADP ribose polymerase and cyclin B levels were not altered in both the cell types after Pt-NP exposure. Conclusion: The results suggest p53 activation in Pt-NP-treated cells due to genotoxic stress, with subsequent activation of p21 leading to a proliferating cell nuclear antigen-mediated growth arrest and apoptosis. This study recommends development of Pt-NP-based anticancer agents by appropriate surface modifications to augment its innate anticancer activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据