4.7 Review

Poly(malic acid) nanoconjugates containing various antibodies and oligo nucleotides for multitargeting drug delivery

期刊

NANOMEDICINE
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 247-265

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/17435889.3.2.247

关键词

biodegradable; brain cancer; breast cancer; imaging analysis; multiple antibodies; multiple drug delivery; multitargeting; Polycefin; poly(malic acid); tumor angiogenesis

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA123495-03, CA123495, R01 CA123495] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000425, M01 RR00425] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NEI NIH HHS [EY13431, R01 EY013431-07, R01 EY013431] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA123495] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000425] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY013431] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoconjugates are emerging as promising drug-delivery vehicles because of their multimodular structure enabling them to actively target discrete cells, pass through biological barriers and simultaneously carry multiple drugs of various chemical nature. Nanoconjugates have matured from simple devices to multifunctional, biodegradable, nontoxic and nonimmunogenic constructs, capable of delivering synergistically functioning drugs in vivo. This review mainly concerns the Polycefin family of natural-derived polymeric drug-delivery devices as an example. This type of vehicle is built by hierarchic conjugation of functional groups onto the backbone of poly(malic acid), an aliphatic polyester obtained from the microorganism Physarum polycephalum. Particular Polycefin variants target human brain and breast tumors implanted into animals specifically and actively and could be detected easily by noninvasive imaging analysis. Delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to a tumor-specific angiogenic marker using Polycefin resulted in significant inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and increase of animal survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据