4.8 Article

Sodium iron hexacyanoferrate with high Na content as a Na-rich cathode material for Na-ion batteries

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 117-128

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0588-7

关键词

sodium iron hexacyanoferrate; Na-rich cathode; sodium-ion batteries; Prussian blue analogues

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51225204, 91127044, 21121063]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB932900, 2011CB935700]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies [DE-AC02-98CH10886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to the worldwide abundance and low-cost of Na, room-temperature Na-ion batteries are emerging as attractive energy storage systems for large-scale grids. Increasing the Na content in cathode materials is one of the effective ways to achieve high energy density. Prussian blue and its analogues (PBAs) are promising Na-rich cathode materials since they can theoretically store two Na+ ions per formula unit. However, increasing the Na content in PBAs cathode materials remains a major challenge. Here we show that sodium iron hexacyanoferrate with high Na content can be obtained by simply controlling the reducing agent and reaction atmosphere during synthesis. The Na content can reach as high as 1.63 per formula, which is the highest value for sodium iron hexacyanoferrate. This Na-rich sodium iron hexacyanoferrate demonstrates a high specific capacity of 150 mAh center dot g(-1) and remarkable cycling performance with 90% capacity retention after 200 cycles. Furthermore, the Na intercalation/de-intercalation mechanism has been systematically studied by in situ Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis for the first time. The Na-rich sodium iron hexacyanoferrate can function as a plenteous Na reservoir and has great potential as a cathode material for practical Na-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据